Thank You: @Patrick727, @adam, @JackALaing
Reference Doc
Quarterly Peer Review: Competencies
Instructions.
- Choose any 3 people.
- Next to the person’s name. Provide a ranking 1-10 on how they demonstrate the competency.
- We’ve added some things to consider when thinking about your reasoning, but speak freely to your interpretation of competencies and their work.
- Below add an explanation including examples worth praising or areas of improvement that we can work to better support.
The spirit of this is to support each other’s growth, so don’t shy away from criticism, just respectful.
Everyone is an Engineer:
Things to Consider: Productivity, Difficulty of Problems, First principles, Pays their knowledge forward, A self starter. Successfully solving the problem.
Person1: 10/10
Explanation: In all of the projects we have been a part of, they remain focused on the objective key results, constantly tracking progress towards them and communicating when things change. Blah blah blah.
Person 2:
Explanation:
Person3:
Explanation:
Asynchronous Communications Mastery:
Things to Consider: How good is this person at asynchronous communications? Think about how they do text communications, what their meetings are like before and after. If they manage expectations. Are they curating and distilling insights into appropriate places? How is there follow through?
Person1:
Explanation:
Person 2:
Explanation:
Person3:
Explanation:
Constantly Evolving Together
Things to Consider: Are they proactively learning & sharing? Do they consolidate/distill insights? How do they deliver feedback? Do they work in public? Balancing short-long term perspectives? How do they operate as a teammate? Do they actively reinforce values and goals? Non-work engagement? How are they when conflicts arise? Do they approach it as an opportunity to learn, grow and share?
Person1:
Explanation:
Person 2:
Explanation:
Person3:
Explanation:
Superhuman Abilities
Things to Consider: Can both lead and follow. Checks personal bias’ and emotional states. Demonstrates extreme ownership. Cultivates an environment of creative problem solving. Makes good judgement calls when considering timing, team and access to information.
Person1:
Explanation:
Person2:
Explanation:
Person3:
Explanation:
Iteration not Perfection
Things to Consider: Breaks down things into digestible chunks, the reversibility and consequences of their initiatives. Use of Gut, Heart and Brain in decision making. Improves rapidly. Delivered on time. Fosters iterative value in community initiatives.
Person1:
Explanation:
Person2:
Explanation:
Person3:
Explanation:
Sustainable and Progressive Decentralization
Things to Consider: Uses DAO, Discourse, Discord. Uses and Improves upon open frameworks like the RFP pipeline, advise process etc. Leads by example. Actively seeks opportunities to involve community members in a productive way. Works in public. Proactively seeks diversity of people and perspectives.
Person1:
Explanation:
Person2:
Explanation:
Person3:
Explanation:
Leadership & Management
Things to Consider: Applies emotional intelligence to personalize management approach. Self Manages. Turns challenges into opportunities to grow. Actively reinforces values and principles. Applies extreme ownership. Models values publicly. Delivers feedback respectfully. Creates productive dialogue environments. Attracts and retains top talent by creating an inclusive environment built on trust, delegation, accountability, and teach-ability.
Person1:
Explanation:
Person2:
Explanation:
Person3:
Explanation: