PIP-38: Proposal for Pocket Network Governance and Economic Reform (SECOND REVISION)

[BTTheDefendoooor (BT)]

Your stance is incredibly baffling. I just read all the pushback you gave the CREDS system, and now you’ve completely reversed your position on always having “trustless” model.

It’s amusing how you’re now happy to give your complete “trust” to Mike after advocating for a trustless model just a few months ago.

@steve

I trust you, @Dermot, @b3n, and the rest of the PNF team. But this isn’t the way if we’re trying to create a governance model that works regardless of our levels of trust in one another.

@steve

However, we are all aligned in wanting a system that can be trusted regardless of who is leading PNF in the future. So, from my perspective, this is not about getting comfortable now. It’s more about keeping us comfortable over the next “3-5 years and beyond”.

What a difference the author of a proposal makes.

I won’t question your motives, but this clearly shows how favoritism runs rampant in the DAO. You spent hours critiquing the CREDS system and constitutional changes but haven’t pushed back on anything in Mike’s proposal and were even happy to accept the initial proposal.

@steve

There are too many significant changes conflated into this one proposal. I’ve spent over 12 hours reviewing the changes and considering their implications, and I still don’t feel like I fully understand them.

Lastly, you speak of not voting for this proposal as a lack of leadership. Far from it. Leadership was demonstrated under the old PNF. What Mike has displayed is anything but.