A little late commenting here. Applaud the efforts on Governance innovation to design a mechanism for Governance to be earned, not bought. Will spend some more time digging into the various links in this post but one immediate question that comes to mind is:
Where would an organisation fit into that is contributing on multiple fronts: sockets, gateways, staking, PNF partnerships, Gateways etc. would this all be linked to a single delegate identity thats on behalf of all contributions/contributors or would each individual contribution be treated and therefore engage in Governance independently?
In Developer DAO’s case, we’ve collectively contributed across various fronts (PNF Partnership, Members submitting Sockets, events [1,2]) and we plan to propose further ways to align with POKT and support the Networks success. Curious what is the best way to move forward with this so we can have a strong DAO-to-DAO relationship and become more active contributors to POKT’s Governance (and potentially vice versa if this is of interest to POKT DAO).