Pre-Proposal - POKTscan Geo-Mesh Reimbursement

[b3n]

There is a lot of good discussion in this thread but mostly I think it is veering into broader questions of DAO priorities, values, compensation and ancillary issues. Geo-Mesh is not an avatar for solving these broader questions for the DAO. PNF will make some comments shortly but I think we should try to focus on the specific purpose of this thread: Geo-Mesh.

Please do continue to illuminate broader challenges or ask questions about priorities and values here:

What is our Pocket DNA?

Following from this post here, it is worth remembering that Pocket’s strong sense of mission and shared values have made the project unique and attracted so many of the employees, DAO contributors, investors, node runners and builders that have joined the community over the years. The Pocket DAO seeks to represent all of these stakeholders through its governance and the allocation of resources within its treasury. As we enter 2023, Pocket is not the same as it once was. Until very recently, Poc…

And please direct your unique issues, questions or POV related to compensation and equitable contributions here:

Compensation Structure for DAO Contributors

One of the friction points in contributions to the DAO has been the lack of suggested structure for how contributors are compensated. There have been some functional practices, but not terribly well defined, and we’ve seen proposals take on a number of forms. Currently, we have two forms that actually work well: Reimbursement A team performs work, submits a request for reimbursement, and it is evaluated by the DAO and voted to approve or reject. If rejected, the team may resubmit, incorporatin…

And of course, questions on the specifics of POKTscan and Geo-Mesh reimbursement should continue to be directed to the POKTscan team in this current thread