I think this proposal is just expected, @Jinx has been running things for a while now and making it official just makes sense.
However, the DAO is crippled by PIP-38. The current state provides the directors (a single one right now) too much power. The effects of that power concentration are not all good and I think we should not normalize the current state.
While it is known that the current mechanics of the DAO are broken and need revamping and that work towards that end is being done, the objective of normalizing the DAO governance process is only referred as:
I would like a much more descriptive take on the DAO role under this new administration. Specifically, I would like to see horizons on returning the DAO the power to shape the protocol. To be clear, I’m not asking for the technical implementation, but on the effective power of the DAO to:
- Set parameters
- Propose protocol changes
With Michael we knew that it was supposed to be a temporary state, with a 24 months horizon (based on his targets). We all know that much has changed and much of what Michael proposed is not valid anymore. How is this going to be with Jinx? When do we expect to see a working DAO again?