PIP-38: Proposal for Pocket Network Governance and Economic Reform (SECOND REVISION)

[steve (Steve Tingiris)]

Thanks for your feedback, @BTTheDefendoooor .

@BTTheDefendoooor

It’s amusing how you’re now happy to give your complete “trust” to Mike after advocating for a trustless model just a few months ago.

@BTTheDefendoooor

What a difference the author of a proposal makes.

For the record. I was not “advocating for a trustless model,” - I was pushing back on a proposal that I felt would have centralized control (within PNF) while obfuscating accountability. It’s not about the author; it’s about the proposal.

If you read all my comments on CREDS, you would have also seen that I said I would vote for a proposal that centralized control if there was clear accountability.

@steve

I would be more inclined to vote to turn all decision-making over to PNF. At least that way, there would be accountability. This proposal will make it almost impossible to understand the voting system and impossible to audit the outcome of a vote. So nobody will be responsible or able to challenge anything.

I did trust the previous leadership and would likely have supported a proposal similar to this one if they had authored it.

@BTTheDefendoooor

Lastly, you speak of not voting for this proposal as a lack of leadership. Far from it. Leadership was demonstrated under the old PNF. What Mike has displayed is anything but.

The previous leadership stepped down. In my opinion, stepping down in the face of adversity is not leadership. So, yes, from my perspective, a vote against this proposal is a vote for a lack of leadership.