See my comment above @RawthiL. @poktblade was speaking out of conjecture, not facts.
This kind of conversation is veering away from what would be the best altruist solution for POKT and it’s customers to discussion chain node pooling.
I would be happy to discuss chain node pooling, how it provides decentralization of POKT node ownership, address chain node over provisioning (which is the largest cost to the POKT ecosystem), and how it incentivizes independent node runners (who took a real hit when providers were capturing market share with closed source geo-meshing, which POKTScan addressed 
)… but this thread is not the place. PNI was the first to publically discuss it as a ecosystem strategy in October and it is frequently talked about in Node Runners Office Hour, and we’ve been sharing our work on it on since October… so there is a rich history of this convo which we can have elsewhere.
My Ask To Everyone…
Let’s please keep this conversation focused on the proposal and it’s merits.
Let’s also keep our conversation fact based and considerate of all parties 