Thank you @Rajeevan_Blockwall
Nothing looks unusual to me in crypto/web3; this space is all about breaking norms and traditions. This is a space where even individual salaries are public at times and people get to question those, let alone deals.
I don’t know what is right or wrong yet. The pendulum will swing hard and we shall see where it settles one day, IMO.
The proposal got initiated in forum, which is a public space for all DAO related discourses. And here we are discussing/debating it. It has taken its normal course from its origin.
Yes, agreed and few of us have raised similar needs very recently: representative democracy, payment structures, budgeting, marketing budgets, etc. Please read @Cryptocorn 's last response on this thread, this and this.
The foundation (the DAO) is new, so I believe we will get there slowly but surely.
But at this moment, this is how it is.
Above all- the DAO will always discuss and debate, and at times unusual looking subjects. That really can’t be stopped, irrespective of the structures and titles.
Agreed with everything else.
The sentiment is crawling towards green as I see it, from being majority red in the beginning. The community is fairly aligned as far as the timing is concerned- Q3/Q4 timeframe (will favour Q3 start as a compromise).
My personal stance is-
But I stay sensitive to the remaining dissenting voices.
Will talk to a few members.