Nominations for DAO Committee to Oversee Reward Distribution

PIP-39, the proposal to install DAO Oversight of Rewards for Shannon Rollout and Price Milestones, passed yesterday.

The proposal calls for creating a DAO committee of up to three members to oversee the disbursement of rewards for Shannon rollout completion and price target achievement.

If you wish to serve on the committee, please post a short note below. You should introduce yourself, say why you want to sit on the committee, and set out briefly what qualifies you to assess the propriety and reasonableness of the Foundationā€™s decisions on how to allocate the rewards.

Recusal for votes on your own rewards

You may serve on the committee even if you are a prospective reward recipient. But youā€™ll need to recuse yourself from votes on your own rewards.

To understand the committeeā€™s role, youā€™ll need to review PIP-39.

Anticipated workload per reward event: 30 hours or, if there are three members, approximately 10 hours per committee member. Pay rate: $100 per hour.

Self-nomination Deadline: February 18

Deadline for self-nominations is end of the day Tuesday, February 18. A DAO vote will launch the following day (Wednesday) shortly after the weekly Ecosystem call.

Voting Method: Approval Voting

The DAO vote to select committee members will run for seven days at snapshot.box and use ā€œApproval Voting,ā€ that is, voters will be asked to approve up to four nominees from the list. For example, if there are eight nominees, voters can approve up to four.

The three nominees with the most approvals will be chosen to sit on the committee.

First Runner-up To Act as a Substitute

The first runner-up, that is, the nominee who gets the fourth most approvals, will act as a substitute in cases where one of the three committee members has to recuse due to a conflict of interest. This will prevent deadlocks by preserving the committeeā€™s ability to make majority decisions. In addition, should one of the top three choices at any time and for any reason step aside, either temporarily or permanently, the substitute will take their place - thereby eliminating the need for a (tiresome) DAO vote for a replacement, temporary or permanent, as the case may be.

As the selection of a 4th nominee to act as a sub as noted above was not specified as part of PIP-39 (turns out I didnā€™t anticipate every possible scenario :frowning: ), by approving four nominees, you are agreeing to this use of a substitute.

1 Like

My name is Michael I am a builder @ x.com leveraging Pocket network to build an on ramp service.
I have been interested in POKT since ā€˜phase oneā€™ this is the ā€˜second phaseā€™ since I started contributing and I believe I have the bandwidth to contribute on this.

2 Likes

My name is Ramiro, Iā€™ve been working on POKT since 2022.
I know the Morse and Shannon protocol and Iā€™ve been following its development closely.
I can provide some insights on some parts of the protocol and clients design and execution.

4 Likes

My name is John, I go by Tim Riggins. I have been an active community member and done some lift with community communications. I believe from a non-technical perspective, I would be a reasonable consideration to contribute.

2 Likes

Hey, breezytm here! Iā€™ve been around Pocket since 2021ā€”guess that makes me a bit of a dinosaur :sweat_smile:. Iā€™m a node hosting provider, running infrastructure to support the network, and Iā€™ve also been involved in supporting Morse, as well as contributing to some Shannon components development and beta testing.

Would love to pitch in and help however I can!

3 Likes

Hi guys, Iā€™m Ale! Iā€™ve been in Pocket since '22, participated in the community in both English and EspaƱol, created mkt materials, and worked on graphic design for different projects in the ecosystem. I believe decentralised oversight is key to keeping things fair and transparent. Happy to keep contributing and support the ecosystem and communityā€™s best interest.

3 Likes

Happy to throw my hat in the ring. Although I can claim very little credit for any of the work that @zaatar did here, Iā€™ve been providing my thoughts to zaatar and am equipped to contribute on the committee.

My Pocket History:

  • Iā€™ve been involved since 2019 and was on the core team for almost 3 years. I authored several key proposals and have been a DAO voter for the entire length of the DAO.

Why Me?

  • A long history of involvement in Pocket.
  • Iā€™m an experienced web3 operator and contributor with a history of involvement in key aspects such as finance and operations.
  • I do my best to stay neutral in the politics of Pocket and try to use first-principles thinking to make decisions.

Considerations

  • Iā€™m non-technical, and I believe at least one representative of this committee should be technical and well-versed in tech compensation. While Iā€™m familiar with various compensation schemes for developers, a technical voice on the committee would be valued. Thereā€™s room for several non-technical members and I believe I am capable of serving effectively as one of those non-technical members, but not at the exclusion of this skillset.
3 Likes

Iā€™m adding my name to the list of nominees.

Until recently and for many years, I worked as a criminal defense attorney. I co-own a company that has been operating Pocket nodes since 2021.

A Lawyerā€™s Input Is Useful

Eager for Pocketā€™s success, I recognize the importance of a healthy and well-run DAO. Thatā€™s why I authored the DAO Oversight Committee proposal. Given that a big part of the committeeā€™s job will be to prevent monkey business and guard against arbitrary allocation decisions, a lawyerā€™s eyes and experience will be useful.

4 Likes

Hey everyone,

My name is Tracie and Iā€™d like to put my name forward for the DAO Oversight Committee. I believe my experience and deep understanding of this ecosystem make me an ideal candidate to align with our long-term goals.

Iā€™ve been part of this project since the early days on the original core team in 2018, helping write the original white paper and laying the foundation for our tokenomics. For the past three years, Iā€™ve also operated the largest staking pool in the ecosystem, giving me hands-on experience with the ecosystem from all perspectives.

Serving on this committee isnā€™t just about oversight itā€™s about ensuring trust in the process. Iā€™ve spent years working at the intersection of strategy and execution within this ecosystem, and I know how to evaluate whether reward allocations are reasonable and in the best interest of the DAO. My approach is always data-driven, fair, and aligned with what will keep our network thriving.

My goal here is simple: to contribute my expertise in a way that benefits the DAO and ensures rewards are distributed as intended.

Iā€™d love the opportunity to serve in this role, and I appreciate your consideration. Looking forward to keeping our ecosystem strong. :partying_face:

5 Likes

Voting on nominees for the committee has begun. Please register your votes at snapshot.box. Voting ends at midnight next Wednesday (Eastern time).

Please select FOUR nominees ONLY.

1 Like

DAO Oversight Committee Chosen

The votes are in; 19 people voted. The successful nominees are zaatar (12 votes), Ramiro (11), and Breezy TM (11). Tracie Myers (10 votes) is the stand-in.