PUP-28: Increase MaxValidators - Take Two

[RawthiL (Ramiro | POKTscan)]

This is getting confusing. You quote me and said:

@msa6867

@RawthiL

Also, having most validating power on only two actors makes the network more susceptible to legislation problems (at most two jurisdiction need to pass some crazy law).

Agreed again. It really seems at this point that you are arguing in favor of raising MaxValidators : )

But in fact you expect that after increasing MaxValidators the number of actors to reach consensus will go down:

@msa6867

the number of validator actors needed to reach 67% consensus to go down slightly

This is circular, I will refrain to go down this path any further.

@msa6867

I think we’re starting to loose the forest for the trees.

Agree, the problem of consensus was only one out of the six concerns I have with this proposal.

@msa6867

All this other stuff of opposing the proposal on the grounds that it will lead to greater centralization, greater probability of security breach is not really even logical and has the appearance of being argumentative just for the sake of having to oppose and counter anything I write.

My arguments were never ad hominem. I tried to create a clean argumentation and provide references for all my concerns. I can do no more to create a healthy discussion around this proposal.