Thanks again POKTfund team for your excellent contribution (and to the Thunderhead team as well!)
Sharing a link to my recent post so that we can bring some of this thinking into the equation too
Two main points I would add in the meantime:
-
The impact of this work should be considered as a whole, ie whatever figure we agree on as appropriate for the impact of LeanPOKT should be what is shared between both the Poktfund and Thunderhead teams (cc @addison @Sevi @pierre ) and that the contributors to LeanPOKT should tell us what the appropriate split for their work is (eg 67:33 as mentioned in some previous posts)
-
Chocolate Rain (hilarious name lol) should be judged on its own merits using a similar analysis to how impactful it was