# PEP-51: Cryptocorn Asks for Reimbursement of Energies (CARE) **URL:** \ **Category:** Proposals\ **Created:** [January 29, 2023, 2:45am UTC](https://forum.pokt.network/t/pep-51-cryptocorn-asks-for-reimbursement-of-energies-care/3888 "2023-01-29T02:45:11Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 8
**Author:** ![RawthiL](https://forum.pokt.network/user_avatar/forum.pokt.network/rawthil/32/2971_2.png) [@RawthiL](https://forum.pokt.network/u/RawthiL)\ **Post date:** [January 31, 2023, 12:52pm UTC](https://forum.pokt.network/t/pep-51-cryptocorn-asks-for-reimbursement-of-energies-care/3888/8 "2023-01-31T12:52:49Z")
You are one of the most valuable member of our community as such it would be interesting if the DAO compensates those members that provide value to the discussions. I think that the requested amount is not too high and the fact that it will need to pass a DAO vote is more than enough validation of your work. What I disagree with some concepts that you slip: > [@Cryptocorn](#): > > MSA was rewarded 300,000 POKT under PEP-44. This proposal asks for 120,000 POKT for more hours inputted. > … > While I’m certainly not a ‘gigabrain’ who has committed highly technical or economic theory like MSA, PoktBlade, Shane, Ramiro or others, I’d like to believe that I have had a meaningful impact on Pocket and the community at large, … Even though you address this point in the **Dissenting opinions** to some extent, I have the feeling that the you are still putting the technical people on a different level while you should not. This proposal is for reimbursement in community participation, as such it will be evaluated by DAO members weighting how they _feel_ about your contributions. If you were a technical member and gave technical advising, the DAO would evaluate your work in the same way. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.pokt.network/t/pep-51-cryptocorn-asks-for-reimbursement-of-energies-care/3888)._