In the original proposal, one of my points was this:
The idea being that the Preproposal wouldn’t be litigated in the topic, just refined, and that the scope of GRIP would be narrow and focused. In reality though, they’ve just become the first place a proposal gets debated. I’m not sure that serves the purpose of the original PEP-45. Combined with the amount of hours that have been billed for meetings, the push to make GRIP a default function versus just something asked for, billing for community member time that otherwise would have been normal debate, and seeing GRIP offering services to third party vendors, I think there is some work to do to tighten up around the original PEP. I have reservations regarding the proposal as is.